This paper defines as a prohibition that requires no empirical justification (e.g., harm reduction) but rests on symbolic, sacred, or ontological grounds. Mary Douglas (1966) argued that taboo arises from anomalies that blur categorical boundaries. The "always close" relationship—parent-child, siblings, childhood best friends who become lovers—blurs the boundary between natural affection and sexual/transgressive desire. The phrase suggests that the intimacy preceded the taboo, yet the taboo retroactively marks the intimacy as illicit.
Research suggests that taboo relationships often stem from a deep-seated emotional need for connection and intimacy. These bonds can be intense and all-consuming, yet simultaneously fraught with guilt, shame, and secrecy. Those involved may experience feelings of isolation and loneliness, as they struggle to reconcile their desires with the societal norms that condemn their relationship. always been close pure taboo