Avigilon Jun 2026

Avigilon operates in the high-end commercial, industrial, and critical infrastructure segments. Its primary competitors include Hikvision and Dahua (cost leadership, but facing Western regulatory restrictions), Axis Communications (innovation in network video), and Genetec (open-platform VMS).

Avigilon's journey from a small startup to a global leader in intelligent video and analytics solutions is a testament to innovation and perseverance. As the company continues to push the boundaries of what is possible in surveillance, one thing is clear: Avigilon is revolutionizing the way we approach security, making the world a safer and more secure place. avigilon

Pandora Open Manifesto (pandoraopen.io)

Pandora Open is an Open Source project committed to knowledge freedom, transparency, and technological sovereignty. This manifesto defines the principles that guide its development and how the community makes decisions and maintains the code.

1. Independence without affiliations

Pandora Open is an autonomous project, with no ties to corporate, state, or geopolitical agendas. Its commitment is to knowledge freedom and to the right of everyone to use, understand, and improve the software they rely on.

2. Radical code freedom

Pandora Open is not a “community edition” nor a limited version. It is fully free software, published under an open license and maintained so that anyone can audit, modify, and redistribute the code without artificial restrictions.

3. Absolute independence

Pandora Open and Pandora FMS are different projects. Although they share part of the codebase and diverged starting from version 777, they will not share further code nor align their roadmaps. Pandora Open follows its own path, guided by the community and by those who defend technological sovereignty.

4. Acknowledged origin, free destination

The common origin with Pandora FMS is acknowledged, but control and direction of Pandora Open belong to the community. It is published so others can take it further, with full freedom to evolve.

5. Self-management and horizontality

Project governance is open, without imposed hierarchies. Decisions are made publicly, by consensus, and contributions are valued for their technical merit, not their origin.

6. Transparency as a principle

Every decision, every line of code, and every contribution will be visible. There are no reserved features, no backdoors, and no hidden dependencies. Transparency is not an added value; it is the foundation of the project.

7. Free code to reclaim freedom

In a world where software is used as a tool of control, defending free code means defending the ability to decide. As Emma Goldman said: “If I can’t dance, it’s not my revolution.” Here, if we cannot read and write the code, it is not our software.

8. Technological sovereignty in infrastructure and oversight

The concentration of digital infrastructure and technological oversight in the hands of a few power blocs turns blind dependency into a direct threat to the autonomy of countries, companies, and individuals. Pandora Open holds that security cannot rely solely on open code, but also on the transparency of intentions and practices of those who lead it. A system is truly secure when its foundations — both technical and human — are free of hidden interests and accountable only to the community that uses and maintains it.

Pandora Open is not just a fork: it is a commitment to independence, transparency, and community. A project born free to remain free.

Code is knowledge. Knowledge is power. Power must be free.

Pandora Open Governance Guidelines

These guidelines define how Pandora Open is managed from its inception, ensuring that the project preserves its independence, its openness, and its radically free spirit over time.

1. Structural independence

Pandora Open and the commercial version of Pandora FMS will always remain separate projects, with no exchange of code, features, or strategic resources. No decision within Pandora Open may be subordinated to commercial, political, or state interests.

2. Community governance

The project will be led by an Open Steering Committee composed of active community members. Membership on the committee will be based on merit, including the quality of contributions, sustained involvement, and commitment to the manifesto’s values. The committee may be periodically renewed through public voting among contributors with a verified track record.

3. Full transparency

All strategic decisions, directional changes, and technical debates must take place in public spaces accessible to any user. Committee meetings will generate public minutes that are archived, and the code change history will be fully open, with no private development branches.

4. License and code openness

All code of Pandora Open will be published under the GPLv2 license, without additional restrictive clauses. Proprietary modules or closed features will not be allowed within the project’s core.

5. Technical decision-making

Technical decisions will be made by consensus whenever possible and, if not, by committee vote. Technical proposals (RFCs) must be published in advance, include a review period, and receive public feedback before approval.

6. Protection against capture

No company, organization, or government may exercise majority control over the committee. Representation limits per entity will be established to prevent conflicts of interest and safeguard the project’s independence.

7. Funding and resources

Project funding, if any, must come from transparent and diversified sources. All income and expenses related to Pandora Open will be public and accessible to the community.

8. Relationship with the project’s origin

Pandora Open acknowledges that its code derives from the initial work of Pandora FMS, but it will have no operational, strategic, or commercial subordination to this or any other company. The Pandora FMS company may participate in the community under the same conditions as any other contributor.

9. Continuity guarantee

The official repository will have at least two independent mirrors controlled by different committee members to prevent loss or takeover of the code. In the event of committee dissolution, the community may call open elections to reconstitute it.

10. Review and evolution of the guidelines

These guidelines may only be amended through an open process, with public consultation and approval by a qualified majority of the active community.