This is the film’s most dangerous trick. The aesthetic beauty constantly argues that David’s obsession is poetic. When he stalks Jade through the woods, the light filters through leaves like a cathedral. When he writes her endless letters, the camera lingers on his elegant handwriting. Zeffirelli seems to be in love with the idea of obsessive love, even as the plot spells out its consequences. The result is a dizzying, dissonant experience—a horror movie dressed in a romance novel’s clothing.
Visually, Endless Love is a masterpiece of contradiction. Zeffirelli, the master of Romeo and Juliet (1968), fills every frame with golden sunlight, soft breezes through lace curtains, and dewy, rain-kissed lawns. The Butterfield home looks like a New England paradise. The sex scene (tasteful, brief, and notably chaste for the controversy it generated) is shot like a Renaissance painting. endless love 1981
, in his film debut, had the impossible task of making David sympathetic. Hewitt has the cheekbones of a fallen angel and the eyes of a lost puppy, but his performance is so one-note—intense stare, trembling lip, breathless monologue—that David never reads as "tragic romantic." He reads as a time bomb. When he finally snaps, the audience feels less sorrow and more relief that someone is finally calling the police. This is the film’s most dangerous trick
Should you watch Endless Love (1981)? Yes, but not for a cozy date night. Watch it as a cultural artifact. Watch it for the golden-hour cinematography that will make you jealous of 1980s film stock. Watch it for Brooke Shields looking like a Pre-Raphaelite painting. Watch it for Martin Hewitt’s beautifully unhinged performance that swings from puppy love to psychotic break in 90 minutes. When he writes her endless letters, the camera
...